Coronavirus Vaccines
Why You’ll Never Have Informed Consent!
Someone asked me yesterday what I thought about the so-called Covid vaccines.
And my reply, given that the four guys asking had all had the jab, was as popular as a turd in a swimming pool.
“I consider it a taxation on stupid people. Only an eighteen karat Benny would even consider it”
Before I answer as to exactly ‘why’ I made such an offensive and bold claim, and before I also offer you the iron clad, scientific, peer reviewed evidence that 100% backs it up, here’s a question for you.
Is it possible to tell lies and the truth at the same time?
Because it is if you’re a politician or a medical scientist trained in using rubber numbers, and before the proof of this, let me ask you two more questions.
You’ve been told, like me, that these Covid vaccines are anywhere between 50% and 95% effective, yes?
We’ve all seen public press and TV information similar to below, haven’t we?
That’s right, so if we stopped a thousand people on any street corner anywhere in the world and ask them how effective the Pfizer jab is at stopping a person catching Covid, then we’ll hear them tell us; ‘95%’, right?
Or, we could ask any BBC/ITN/CNN/SKY TV news anchor, radio host or journalist, or for that matter we could ask Oprah Winfrey or Bill Gates the same question, and we’ll hear the same reply, ‘95 percent’.
But ask any independent health researchers and Life Coaches, like us, the same question, and you’ll hear; 1% Effective, at Best!
How come?
Because being independent health researchers firstly means we don’t believe a single fucking word that leaves a politician’s mouth, any more than we believe their mainstream media puppets, i.e. the press/social media or TV.
As great independent researchers, it means we’ve studied, documented and fully understood the history of the medical profession, and know how they’ve been organised, funded, and 100% governed by the big pharmaceutical companies since the 1920’s.
Finally, it means we’re privy to all the underhanded tricks big pharma are allowed to get away with in order to bring their poison drugs to market, and, whenever they can, to also ensure they remain free from liability when they maim people.
Big pharma is, by far, the biggest single sponsor, lobbyist, contributor or greaser of political campaigns worldwide, and they do this for very good reasons as you’ll soon discover.
But. What if I could absolutely prove to you that these vaccines were actually only 1% effective, and the 95% figures are pure bullshit!
In other words, I’m asking that if you discovered that these vaccines were way over hyped and only a pitifully 1% effective, then would that fact colour your decision towards having the jab in any way, or allowing your elderly and frail Mum to have it with your full consent?
Given that any vaccine or drug will often have mild to lethal side effects, let alone these new experimental one’s that haven’t ever been used in human beings before, and when they were tested on animals since 2002 the always resulted in either death or severe autoimmune problems, resulting in the trials going no further.
That’s the whole point of ‘Informed Consent’
You’re supposed to be told of all the risks involved, and then weigh those risks against the benefits, then, after doing your own mental risk/reward analysis, decide if you’re for or against having the jab.
So far, on the risk side of things (unless you’re a real Benny who’s been living in a cave this past year), you know there’s a fair risk that you may catch a virus that has a 99.8% survival rate if your healthy, and still a 90+% survival rate even if you’re a decrepit old fucker with multiple co-morbidities, who’s already walking a tightrope of death and on multiple immune lowering medications.
You also know, or should know by now, that there have been thousands of people who’ve died worldwide, shortly after having their jab, and many more still who’ve been hospitalised with blood clots etc., never mind the millions who simply felt like shit for several days’ post vaccine.
Those are the risks of not being vaccinated versus taking the jab.
Now, weigh those risks up against a very impressive 95% guarantee of never catching Covid in the first place, and, although I’d still call you a ‘Benny’, you might be thinking it’s well worth the risk to take the vaccine.
But, if you weigh those risks up against just a pathetic 1% chance of protection, then even Benny from Crossroads would flat out refuse the jab, wouldn’t he?
By the end of this article, when I’ve proven beyond doubt that the efficacy of these vaccines are in fact 1% or less, then you will also come to understand that not one single soul out of the hundreds of millions already vaccinated, has ever received Informed Consent.
Not one!
They simply can’t have, because if no one’s shared this 1% scandal with them, then how could they possibly have been ‘Informed’ about the truth of the High Risks v the Shameful Benefits?
Efficacy and Safety
Efficacy and Safety are the only two criteria that anyone taking a vaccine should ever be concerned with, and this brings us on to;
Telling Lies and the Truth at the Same Time
Because legally, both the 95% and the 1% figures are absolutely true!
However, I was under the understanding (certainly in the U.S) that by law, our healthcare providers have to provide us with both figures, for the exact reasons I’ve been banging on about in these past paragraphs.
You see, our lawmakers, quiet correctly know that the general public don’t have a fucking clue as to how drug manufacturers arrive at such fanciful figures as; 95% effective, and, in an effort to pretend to be transparent, but more likely to stop us suing them, they require these drug companies to provide both Relative Risk Reduction (95%) and something called the Absolute Risk Reduction, which in this farcical case, and depending on which vaccine, is around 1%.
(to avoid confusion the above terms are sometimes referred to as; Relative Benefit and Absolute Benefit, but here their using Relative and Absolute ‘Risk Reduction’ because that’s what these vaccines are designed for, to reduce the risk of catching Covid)
So, now to the difference between Relative and Absolute Risk Reduction, and if this doesn’t shock you to the core then you must truly be dead from the neck up.
Let’s imagine we’re testing a new vaccine, and we have 200 people in our trial.
All 200 are symptom free, and we split them into two groups of 100, making sure to make them as near the same regarding sex and age etc.
One group (of 100) gets the vaccine and the other 100 receive a placebo (fake jab) of saline.
Two weeks later, and two (2) people in the unvaccinated (placebo) group have been tested positive for Covid.
But in the group that received the vaccine, only one (1) person tests positive.
There were 100 people in both groups remember, so how effective has this vaccine been?
How many people from the vaccinated group have been protected from Covid compared to the unvaccinated group?
One person (1), right?
So our vaccine is 1% effective, yes?
Fuck No! 2% minus 1% doesn’t equal 1%!
Not if you’re a pharmaceutical company trying to make billions from a fake pandemic it doesn’t, and not if the laws have been manipulated in your favour to make it possible to both lie, and tell the truth at the same time.
No, it’s not 1% effective, as my South London maths teacher would have me believe, it is, in fact, a whopping and impressive 50% effective!
Confused and angry yet?
You fucking should be, and angrier still when I tell you that the 1% is what we call the; Absolute Benefit/Risk Reduction.
The bullshit 50% number comes about because, Relative to the two people who were positive in the unvaccinated group, only one tested positive in the vaccinated group, and 1 ‘Relative’ to 2 is………….. drum roll please;
50% Better!
So now these corrupt bastards are legally allowed to claim a 50% protection benefit for their shite vaccine, and, regardless of the risks associated with any jab, the shit can go to market to an unsuspecting public, even though it’s only Absolutely 1% better than taking sweet fuck all!
Now, phone your doctor and call him/her a benny for never telling you that, because they pull this Relative Benefit Scam with all drugs, including the best-selling class of drugs of all time, Statins.
Please first bear in mind that Pfizer, from the Lipitor drug alone, between 1992 – 2017 earned $94.67 Billion, from just that one drug!
The Statin trials also used Relative Benefit in its promotional blurb, claiming to reduce the risk of heart attacks by 36%, but, if you looked closely at the small print, they did also explain the Absolute Benefit, and how that worked out to just …you guessed it, 1%!
I couldn’t find a clear enough original Lipitor ad for you to read the small print, but here’s one that’s been doctored with the 36% in the original ad being lowered to 1%, plus some true comments to the right, otherwise it’s as is.
Still, maybe you can just about make out the small print in the bottom left corner.
If you think I’ve done too much doctoring, type into Google; Lipitor original ad.
But this below might also help to expose the Statin fraud.
So now we have tens of millions of men worldwide taking a hideous and unnecessary Statin drug, with listed side effects that read like a nightmare medical highlight reel, including; Heart Attack (which is hilarious), Memory Loss, Muscle Weakness, Type 2 Diabetes and Erectile Dysfunction, for a rubbish drug that may reduce the risk of them ever having a heart attack, and not even a lethal one mind you, but just a regular survivable heart attack, by a whopping 1%!
I wouldn’t risk my cock not working, feeling weak and forgetting where I live for anything less than 100% heart attack protection, how about you?
Hell, scratch that, I’d rather have a fucking heart attack!
It’s thought that even doctors and nurses don’t know the difference between Absolute and Relative Benefit, so you might want to bear that in mind before you lock horns with those, often know it all fuckwits, over these Covid vaccines.
It also follows that doctors and nurses evidently can’t read small print either, since it was clearly there on the Statin literature, but is, as I said, shockingly absent on anything I’ve seen from Pfizer/Moderna/Astra Zeneca or the U.K or U.S Governments.
Maybe President Trump waved his magic emergency measures wand and also changed the very laws that were designed explicitly to protect and give the public the right to proper Informed Consent, because only by being able to understand the difference between Absolute and Relative Risk Reduction can any citizen make the right Risk/Benefit decision.
And I’m sure you’ll agree we’re not splitting hairs here, and the difference between 95% and 1% effective is like night and day.
Thinking about it, the public don’t need to know the difference at all, do they?
You do, reading this, but all Joe public ever needs to know is the simple truth of what matters most to him and his loved ones, which in this case is how effective will the vaccine be in preventing people from contracting Covid.
And that simple truth has been denied to billions of good people worldwide by health agencies, elected public officials, and the mainstream media.
More worrying still, is that Boris Johnson and every other twat of an elected official, seem to have followed Trumps lead in this global deception.
The thing you need to grasp about politicians, ministers, senators, mayors, councillors etc. is that firstly, they don’t have a fucking clue about anything health related. Just look at them!
Most of them are on statins, blood pressure and sleeping meds, retarded low fat, low sodium diets, you name it, they’re on it.
Why?
Because they’re mugs just like everyone else, and without health advocates like us by their side they’re also fodder for the men in white coats.
Next, is the absolute fact that politicians are bought and paid for by the pharmaceutical industry.
Finally, and this is a very key point, is that the one thing our elected officials can never do in a situation like this pandemic is… Nothing!
Doing nothing makes the voters think the politicians don’t care or are weak and incompetent, so they have to be seen to be doing ‘something’, even when that ‘something’ entails running around like headless, indecisive chickens, who frequently move the goalposts regarding lockdown or curfew bollocks etc.
Our elected officials you see, are consulting with complete wankers who are also bought and paid for by the pharmaceutical industry, and who also have to give the illusion of knowing what the fuck their doing.
These wankers have been giving our elected leaders panic inducing advice from day one about mask wearing, social distancing, quarantine, contact tracing, and ridiculous, inappropriate, and of course grossly oversensitive PCR tests.
Tests that clearly state on the fucking instructions they come with that they’re for; Research Use Only, and not for Diagnosis.
Below is copied from the first half of page 5 of the PCR user’s manual
RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Kit 1.01.
Application
The RealStar® SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR Kit 1.0 is a reagent system, based on real-time PCR technology, for the qualitative detection and differentiation of lineage B-betacoronavirus (B-βCoV) and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) specific RNA.
For research use only (RUO)! Not for use in diagnostic procedures.
Click here to open the full PDF;
That’s right, every PCR test ever used to diagnose every bullshit ‘Confirmed Case’ shouldn’t have ever been used, never mind reported in the media, and even the inventor of the test, Kary Mullis, is on public record as saying;
“it’s so sensitive you can detect almost anything in anyone, so don’t use it for diagnosis”
But the wankers advising our elected officials told them, and us, that PCR was ‘The Gold Standard’.
This mass political confusion is like father’s day in Brixton!
To compound matters further, most of the world are still in the pockets of America over massive debts incurred from World Wars 1 and 2, which the yanks financed, and then the massive handouts by the Rockefeller Institutes to medical universities/facilities worldwide, over the same period.
This leads to wanker Boris talking to wanker Donald, probably on a conference call with all the other wanker world leaders, all asking each other; ‘what’re you gonna do?’, and all deciding to sing from the same hymn sheet so as to provide some consistency, but that hymn sheet is usually American in origin.
The only exception being Sweden, but even they are being put under extreme pressure to comply with the global idiots wishes. Still, even if they do introduce a few of the draconian measures now, they’ve still saved their nation and its economy from more than a year of misery and financial disaster.
The only criticism against Sweden might be that it could have taken better precautions for its elderly population in care homes.
As of 13th of April 2021, some 814 million shots of this super expensive Covid bollocks have been dished out to what will soon be a billion people worldwide.
Of these unsuspecting and trusting human lab rats, not one has had the privilege, the common courtesy, or even the basic human right to True Informed Consent.
How much money have the drug companies already made from those 814 million shots, and the billions more they’ll ship out during this continuing crisis, and then for each flu season in the coming years?
How many back handers and bribes did it take, we wonder, to engineer the sale of a billion shots of pure dogshit that boasts less than 1% efficacy?
Throughout this article I’ve been saying ‘less than 1% effective’, and so, from their own published data, here are the shocking and scandalous exact figures, and below that is a link to the scientific peer reviewed published data that backs the data up.
Pfizer/BioNTech Vaccine BNT 162b2… Absolute Risk Reduction = 0.7%!
Moderna Vaccine mRNA-1273…Absolute Risk Reduction = 1.1%!
Meaning that 142 Benny’s need to receive the Pfizer vaccine to reduce one case of Covid!
By comparison, Moderna vaccines need to find their way into 88 uninformed citizens queuing around the block, to reduce a single case of Covid.
This data is also clearly shown in the study below as the; NNV (number needed to vaccinate)
https://www.mdpi.com/1648-9144/57/3/199
And before you say, ‘yes, but 1% of one, two or three billion people is a big number’ those numbers won’t fly I’m afraid, because 1% will be like a pimple on an elephant’s arse and won’t make a lick of difference in the grand scheme of Herd Immunity, which as you know is nearer to 50 to 60%.
Now you can begin to also understand why, even after having both shots of the Pfizer vaccine, people were still told to stay home, observe mask wearing and social distancing, blah, blah, blah. When, with a 95% efficacy rate, they should have been allowed to resume normal life with solid confidence.
This proves our officials fucking well knew the jabs were embarrassingly ineffective all along, and maybe they thought they might offer a glimmer of hope by way of a placebo effect, thus bolstering people’s immune systems somewhat to help weather the storm.
Although I’m a big believer in the power of the human mind, and have researched ‘Placebo’ in some considerable depth, I could never see any vaccine, placebo or otherwise, ending this crisis.
However, Ivermectin could, and is, depending on where you live, and you’re IQ!
For half the cost of the 0.7% Effective Pfizer Jab, each person could instead receive a bottle of Ivermectin that would last a year if they took the recommended dose every 2 weeks as a preventative measure, for as long as they feel vulnerable.
Or they could wait till the onset of any flu like symptoms and then take it, stopping further viral replication and totally reversing the condition within days.
Together with the Ivermectin, and included in the cost, they could also receive 3 month’s supply of Vit D3, Zinc, Vitamin C and daily Aspirin (also anti-viral)
The very best thing they could receive would, of course, be an education in the form of a Life Coaching newsletter from specialists like us.
If you’ve enjoyed being copied into one of the best kept and most scandalous secrets of the medical monopoly (Absolute v Relative Risk Reduction/Benefit), then why not show your support by clicking the link below and buy us a coffee.
Many thanks.
The BluntCoach team.
P.s If the combined 50yrs. of research we Brixton boys have isn’t enough for you, due to our lack of degrees, PhD’s, and use of long poncey words, and you simply must still hear it from people in white coats to believe it, then this is just for you.
Richard M. Fleming
PhD, MD, JD
In 1994, Dr. Fleming presented to the American Heart Association his "theory" that cardiovascular disease was due to inflammation. What was theory in 1994 has now been an absolute fact for decades.
Dr Fleming is a Physicist, Nuclear Cardiologist, Researcher, Biologist, Chemist, Inventor and Author. He’s also extremely independently wealthy, so he doesn’t care who he pisses off, and he got caught himself fudging data and medical fraud back in 2009, so he knows the ropes of this double bent industry, plus he doesn’t give a fuck who he upsets anymore.
He says he was innocent of course, and I can’t be arsed to go into the details, but he is practicing again right now, so I think this makes him a star witness.
Here are some of his quotes re Covid vaccines.
Fleming says the vaccine companies own data, from Pfizer, Moderna, and Johnson & Johnson, all show their vaccines make zero difference in stopping Covid. The Emergency Use Authorization data; “shows there is no difference. It’s just random chance,” he said.
Note from Blunt Coach Andy; I know I showed you above that the vaccines do have maybe a 1% efficacy, but in the grand scheme of science, as the good doctor points out, 1% isn’t statistically significant, and could just as easily show up by chance.
For all we know, Pfizer may have conducted ten vaccine trials side by side, and, having got fuck all results in nine of them, only published the one that got the piss poor 0.7% results, which they then spun into 95% effective, using relative risk.
This happened with studies on SSRI’s for example.
It was only because a researcher forced the drug company to release data under the freedom of information act, that we discovered that antidepressants are complete bullshit, and, if memory serves, they did run about ten trials to find one that showed any results. But that’s another depressing story!
Remember, if you’re the one paying for these billion dollar trials, then you have the Legal Right to ‘Bury the Ones You Don’t Like’, and ‘Only Publish the Ones that Paint your Drug in a Good Light.
You only have to reveal the failed trial data under threat of a court order, which hardly ever happens.
And, as you’ve come to learn, with Absolute Benefit being easily and legally spun into Relative Benefit, even a shitty 1 or 2% improvement over a sugar pill can result in the next blockbuster drug, earning the shareholders billions!
Anyway, more from Dr Fleming;
“In the animal model, they develop spongiform and Mad Cow disease,” Fleming said. “We also know 2 weeks afterwards they develop…what causes Alzheimer’s and neurological disorders.”
Fleming warned the effects could take a year and half to show in humans!
The vaccines have “no statistically significant benefit,” Fleming said, but cause “inflammation and blood clotting, Lewy bodies [associated with dementia], Mad Cow disease, and nothing to benefit.”
Fleming said the Biden regime should call for immediate re-evaluation of “whether there’s any demonstrated efficacy” of the vaccines, “because there’s not.”
Ok. Now let’s hear even more shocking warnings, this time from two squeaky clean, white coat wearing whistle blowers.
The first is non-other than the former Vice President and Scientific Director of Pfizer, Dr Michael Yeadon, and a respected German lung specialist, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg.
Their claims, among many others are;
mRNA vaccine studies are based on fraud, and conceal serious vaccine injuries
Pfizer skipped animal studies to hide pathogenic priming, a deadly effect of coronavirus vaccines
The Doctors warn that coronavirus vaccines will cause autoimmune issues and infertility in women
Vaccine study designs use false positive PCR results on controls to boost vaccine efficacy rate
The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance - this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.
The formation of so-called "non-neutralizing antibodies" can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, "wild" virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well, died after catching the wild virus.
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg and Dr. Michael Yeadon, issued a motion for administrative and regulatory action to the European Medicines Agency (EMA) regarding the new mRNA coronavirus vaccines developed by Pfizer/BioNTech.
Download and read the full Urgent Application to the European Medicine Agency, calling out the BioNtech/Pfizer vaccine study, because it’s based on FRAUD.
It’s only 43 pages long, of exactly why they should’ve halted the trials and never distributed any of this dangerous, innefective muck!
Or, don’t bother reading it, since it was also totally ignored by Trump, who pushed the panic button anyhow, so fuck it, we’re stuck with it!
Seriously though, this report, or Urgent Application to a Medical Authority (the EMA), is so well put together, so detailed, and so comprehensively damning of just how dangerous these vaccines were already well known to be, that I find it beyond imagination that it wasn’t deemed newsworthy by the mainstream press, CNN, ABC, SKY NEWS the wankers running the BBC, or even Philip Schofield for that matter!
It’s not as if this report was written by two random conspiracy nutters, is it?
Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg is also an epidemiologist and an ex German politician, aside from being a lung specialist.
Then we have Dr Yeadon, a retired British doctor, a trained pharmacologist, and ex Vice President of Pfizer’s very own Allergy and Respiratory Research Division, a man who certainly knows Pfizer inside and out after spending 16 years with them.
On Oct. 16th 2020, Dr Yeadon wrote a lengthy article where he said: “There is absolutely no need for vaccines to extinguish the pandemic. I’ve never heard such nonsense talked about vaccines. You do not vaccinate people who aren’t at risk from a disease.”
Yeadon’s petition to the European Medicines Agency to halt vaccine trials followed on Dec. 1. The agency (EMA) didn’t even respond to requests by the premiere news agency, Reuters, for comment on an article they ran on the story.
And that’s all from us today.
Congratulations dear reader, because;
You Now Have Blunt Coach Informed Consent!
Here’s the coffee link again for all you forgetful Red Sea Pedestrians!
14 Comments on “The Illusion of Informed Consent!”
Hello, Neat post. There’s an issue along with your site in internet explorer, could check this… IE nonetheless is the marketplace leader and a large portion of other people will pass over your magnificent writing due to this problem.
Puravive is a weight loss supplement that targets the root cause of weight gain issues in men and women.
I’m so happy to read this. This is the type of manual that needs to be given and not the accidental misinformation that’s at the other blogs. Appreciate your sharing this greatest doc.
Loving the info on this website , you have done great job on the content.
Thank you for sharing excellent informations. Your website is very cool. I’m impressed by the details that you have on this web site. It reveals how nicely you understand this subject. Bookmarked this web page, will come back for extra articles. You, my pal, ROCK! I found simply the info I already searched all over the place and simply couldn’t come across. What an ideal website.
Woah! I’m really digging the template/theme of this website. It’s simple, yet effective. A lot of times it’s very difficult to get that “perfect balance” between usability and visual appearance. I must say that you’ve done a excellent job with this. Additionally, the blog loads extremely quick for me on Firefox. Excellent Blog!
Nice post. I learn something more challenging on different blogs everyday. It will always be stimulating to read content from other writers and practice a little something from their store. I’d prefer to use some with the content on my blog whether you don’t mind. Natually I’ll give you a link on your web blog. Thanks for sharing.
An interesting discussion is worth comment. I think that you should write more on this topic, it might not be a taboo subject but generally people are not enough to speak on such topics. To the next. Cheers
There is noticeably a bundle to know about this. I assume you made certain nice points in features also.
trichelle maida
Today, I went to the beach front with my children. I found a sea shell and gave it to my 4 year old daughter and said “You can hear the ocean if you put this to your ear.” She placed the shell to her ear and screamed. There was a hermit crab inside and it pinched her ear. She never wants to go back! LoL I know this is totally off topic but I had to tell someone!
Excellent blog right here! Also your site lots up very fast! What host are you using? Can I am getting your associate link for your host? I want my web site loaded up as fast as yours lol
Rohan Harris
I like what you guys are up too. Such smart work and reporting! Carry on the excellent works guys I¦ve incorporated you guys to my blogroll. I think it’ll improve the value of my website 🙂